Ivo's LinkedIn ads tease five sharp contract-intelligence hooks, but ivo.ai/home leads with a category line

For businesses with thousands of contracts and vendor relationships, one of the most challenging tasks is to figure out what the latest version of an agreement is, what was originally agreed to, and how contracts have been amended. With Ivo Assistant, combined with Ivo Intelligence, you can see all of the agreements from a single vendor alongside their amendments in a single place, and generate a downloadable summary on how the original agreement has been amended over time. Try out this prompt: Show me the original version of our agreement with [name vendor] and compare it to its amendments.

Your contract portfolio probably has a number of noncompetes you and your team have signed over the years. But would those agreements actually hold up in court? You can find out in minutes. Non-compete enforceability has shifted dramatically in the past two years, particularly in the United States. California expanded its ban to cover out-of-state agreements. Illinois added a salary floor. Delaware courts started striking them instead of rewriting them. The FTC attempted (and failed) to ban them nationally. You’re going to want to make sure that your noncompetes comply with the most current regulations. But how can you do that without manually reading every single noncompete you’ve ever executed? With Ivo Intelligence, try running this prompt against your contract portfolio:  "What are the non-compete laws relevant to the countries and states mentioned in my contracts that I've agreed to in the past two years? Flag any clauses that may not hold up under current regulations." Ivo will find the relevant jurisdictions for you, cross-reference current law, and flag the clauses most at risk.

Many enterprises are global businesses, so legal teams often review and redline bilingual contracts. Attorneys receive a bilingual document that has English in one column and another language on the right, and must review both.  That creates two sets of potential risks. Fortunately, Ivo can review contracts in multiple languages and suggest redlines in both. Next time you have a bilingual contract to review, try out this prompt: “I am reviewing a document that is in two languages. The left column is in English and the right column is in Portuguese. Please identify all risks to my party and suggest redlines for me to insert in both languages.” You’ll receive a risk summary, bilingual redlines, a prioritized list of actions, and, with a single click, the ability to begin deep legal research on relevant topics.

When a contract lands in your inbox with redlines in comments rather than within the document,  the back-and-forth negotiation kicks off like clockwork. You review the redlines, cross-reference your playbook or precedent, draft your response, place it in the comment thread, send it back to the other side, and repeat when you receive the next turn. This slow, repetitive process of drafting, formatting, and placing comments, pulls your time and attention away from more strategic work. Ivo accelerates this process without you ever needing to leave Word, reducing traditional contract review time from hours to mere minutes without sacrificing accuracy or precision. Try this prompt the next time you want Ivo to draft playbook-driven responses to redlines in seconds. “Review the comments in this agreement. Based on my playbook [or whichever playbook you choose] propose redline suggestions that address each comment.” See it in action below.